Search Engine Patents

Shari Thurow wrote a report on a session at Search Engine Strategies San Jose about search engine patents. The session focused on the merits of mining the patents for SEO gold.

Shari correctly identifies the problem. Patents will contain ideas that are not being put into practice. From a legal perspective, it is to the search engine’s advantage to patent as many concepts as they can. Doing this gives them the opportunity to use these ideas in the future, and limits the ability of other search engines to implement the same idea.

Shari provides some good examples of cases where certain concepts are embedded in patents, but not in use. One example I find interesting is that Google has patented a lot of concepts related to link growth over time. For example, a sudden spike in additional links could be a flag of someone manipulating the system. Or a sudden drop in the rate which a site is accumulating links could mean that it is no longer relevant, or important.

These are interesting ideas, but I don’t think anyone can prove that either of these ideas are actually in use.

We regularly read the latest patents when they come out and figure out what they are pointing at and what they mean. It’s a good exercise, and it does reveal interesting tidbits of information.

But regardless of what any patent says, I can assure you that your basic mission for your site won’t change. Develop great content that people will want to link to, and then let people know about it, so they will link to it. Effective business development and promotional programs remain key tools in your bag.

There is little chance that a search engine patent will ever be released that will make that a bad idea.

del.icio.us tags:

Domain Aging is a Factor in Rankings

Google looks at the age of your domain name as a small factor in your site’s ranking, and as a factor in evaluating how trustworthy it is. The reason they look at it is that spammers tend to look at their sites as throwaways. So they are very likely to buy a domain site (www.black-hat1.com), start getting some revenue from it, and as it gains traffic, they are already get started on the next site (www.black-hat2.com).

When the day comes that their www.black-hat1.com site gets flushed, www.black-hat2.com is already gaining in traffic. This is an effective way for them to stabilize their revenue and traffic, and not get to concerned when one of their sites gets blacklisted. Some people launch a new site every single week.

However, these types of sites don’t tend to stay around for very long. So looking at domain longevity can be a valuable data point for Google to use.

So assuming that you are looking to build your domain as a long term asset that contains lots of value, you can use this situation to your advantage. Just simply operating your site for a long time is helpful. If you have been running the domain for 3 years, 5 years, or more, you already have a little advantage (this assumes that the “theme” of the domain has remained consistent through that timeframe).

The other thing you can do is to register your domain for more than 1 year at a time. Guys who are launching a new site every week are less likely to register their sites for 10 years at a time. It becomes a real expense for them. It’s a small point, but a small expense for you, and a simple one to address, so why not? We need all the advantages we can get.

How to Think About Link Baiting

Link baiting is a very popular term these days. It refers to the grand art of viral marketing. Success at link baiting requires that you know how to create content that will be popular enough that people will want to link to it.

The concept is a great one. It’s simply the latest iteration of viral marketing. Of course, there are bad ways to do link baiting as well. For example, Eric Ward has a post about Link Bait Kool Aid where he takes issue with it.

Eric’s post does capture the basic danger with getting wrapped up into link bait. Basically, when generating link bait becomes a substitute for building a good site, you are headed for trouble. Frankly, like Eric, I am not fond of the term, because it can become a trap, just as he suggests.

However, the underlying idea of generating link worthy content is fundamental to a long term web strategy’s success. Then wrapping some great “link bait” articles that illustrate the depth of your overall content is likewise a great idea. It’s a fact – people like top 10 lists, humor about their space, and other similar ideas.

You can get a pile of good link bait ideas from Andy Hagans, and Brian Clark. You can also get Rand Fishkin’s take on link bait.

Just be careful, and mindful of your audience. If you are trying to get all your links from .gov and .edu sites, you are going to make link bait of an entirely different flavor than if you are trying to get your links from cooking hobbyist sites. For one thing, it’s unlikely that a blog will be involved.

Keep in mind the “trust” concept outlined in the Andy Hagans link above, and as discussed by Matt Cutts in his blog. Make sure your link bait strategy takes the notion of trust into account. What are the most trusted sites in your market? How are you going to get links from them?

del.icio.us tags:

Googlebot Detection and Combatting Copyright Violations

We live in a world where it’s increasingly common that other sites will copy your good content and re-publish it. This causes concerns that you will be flagged for publishing duplicate content, or that the search engines will not correctly recognize your site as the original author of the content. So what can you do about this problem?

Matt Cutts just posted on the Google Webmaster Blog one part of the answer. Google has now specified an official way to recognize the Google Bot. There are a few ways you can use this information. For example, you can choose to allow only the search engine bots to crawl your site (you would want to identify all the ones you care about) and deny access to all other bots.

There is some risk to this strategy, as Google does periodically implement other bots to check for cloaking. You would end up blocking those bots with this strategy. I am going to see what I can find out from Google about this problem, and what they recommend webmasters do about it.

In any event, if you do see someone crawling your site that is not a web crawler, you can block them pretty simply. If you are running Apache on your servers, you can place a command such as “deny from 00.00.158.37″ in your .htaccess file, where the numbers represent the IP address of the bot crawling your site.

You would only know the IP address is you are regularly checking your log files. But this is something you should do. Protecting your valuable intellectual property is important.

In addition, you should regularly check for the presence of copies of your site, or parts of your site. You can do this by searching on long unique strings from the pages of your site. When you find someone who is copying your content, there are a few steps you should take:

  1. Send them a cease and desist letter, warning them that you will sue.
  2. Send their hosting company a cease and desist letter, telling them that you will hold them liable for the actions of their customer. Include clear proof that you are the copyright holder of the content. This is often the most effective. This often results in the hosting account of the offending party being shut down. The hosting company wants nothing to do with it.
  3. If the offending party is involved in some major affiliate partnership, send a similar letter to their partner.

If these steps all fail, then the next step is to file a DMCA complaint with the search engines. The search engines do act on each of these requests. Google provides an outline of the process here. Among other things you need to provide clear proof that you own the copyright. You will also need to identify each search result that brings up the offending site.

Do not take this step lightly, as it’s a lot of work, and be VERY SURE that you are in the right. You don’t want to start this process trivially, as you will make the search engines very upset if you file an invalid request. But if you are in the right, and the cost of the copyright violation is significant, than this approach is worthwhile.

Yahoo Site Explorer backlink results show links with “nofollow” attribute

It’s common advice in the SEO world that if you want to check a site’s backlinks that you should use Yahoo to do it. It’s excellent advice. Yahoo provides the most complete list of decent links you can find. But did you know that Yahoo’s list of backlinks includes links that have the “nofollow” attribute? For example, here are the backlink results for our site.

In this list of links you can see a link listed from Matt Cutts blog. Lo an behold, if you check it out, you will see that the link is simply there because I commented on one of his posts. The link has the “nofollow” attribute. As a result, the link should have no impact on your rankings.

Or does it? You wonder why Yahoo would list it, if the link had no value. In any event, Yahoo help does say that the links will not be followed. I would assume that this is probably accurate.

I never noticed this in the past. I wonder if Yahoo back links check did this before they moved it into Site Explorer? In any event, if you are backlinking competitors to find sites to contact, just be aware that the links may be “nofollowed”.

The White Hat Kool-Aid Test

I often see blog postings talking about white hat SEOs being on Kool-Aid. The argument goes that “the other guys are cheating and getting away with it, they have an unfair advantage over me”. I can’t afford to give them that advantage. The other tag line goes something like “don’t bring a knife to a gunfight”.

It can get you to thinking that you should bend the rules too. But, it’s a trap. For that reason, let me suggest the following “White Hat Kool Aid test”.

  1. Are you trying to build a long term business?
  2. Is the “asset value” of your business a concern to you?
  3. Do you want search engine algorithm changes to have a low likelihood of dramatically lowering your search engine traffic?
  4. Do you have investors, a board of directors, or employees that depend on you to execute a stable and consistent growth oriented business?
  5. If your search engine rankings suddenly tanked, would your competitors be joyously letting members of the press and your customers know all about it?

If the answer to any of these questions is “yes”, then let me offer you some Kool-Aid.

You need a white hat approach to your search engine strategy.

It’s the only way that you can address the 5 questions above.

Learn what the search engines want you to do. Then do that exceedingly well.