Danny Sullivan’s Future

So the news is finally out. Danny Sullivan, Barry Schwartz, and Chris Sherman are going to operate a new web site that provides search news, known as Search Engine Land. Congratulations to the three of you. This will soon be the most read web site in the SEO world.

In addition, Danny will continue to manage and operate the SES events through 2007, on behalf of Incisive Media.

Search Engines unite on Site Maps Protocol

Donna Fontenot at SEO Scoop picked up the announcement that Yahoo and MSN are now supporting the Google Sitemap protocol. In the official announcement on the Google Webmaster blog, it’s stated that Google, Yahoo, and MSN are going to collaborate on future changes and enhancements to the protocol.

This is great stuff. When the search engines join together to do these things, it makes life much simpler for webmasters. This is a great example of an area that does not represent “core search IP” where the major search engines should collaborate. Hopefully Ask will join this mix as well, because they do have a pretty good search engine as well.

So now that this is done, can we get the search engines to agree on implementing accurate “site:” and “link:” commands? This is another area that would be a huge help to webmasters. And I just don’t believe that this information would somehow reveal any search engine secret sauce. How ’bout it guys?

Tidbits from Webmaster World, Day 2

1. I finally got to meet Donna Fontenot of SEO Scoop. She has an excellent blog, and today made a point that ties in nicely to the current gambling environment here in Las Vegas. Manage your risk dudes and dudettes. Don’t put more on the line than you can afford to lose.

2. I stopped by the duplicate content sessions because I wanted to meet Bill Slawski of SEO by the Sea, another excellent blog for all to read. Bill found some information on a new Google patent today of interest, related to the treatment of ambiguous search queries.

3. While in the duplicate content session, some one asked a question about the “site” tag, and whether or not this would solve the duplicate content problem, when you were syndicating content to other sites. So every one in the audience, including me has a blank look in there eyes, and we are all thinking “what the hell is he talking about?”. Then suddenly, I remembered that I knew the answer!”

So I starting jumping up and down and yelled “pick me! pick me!” … OK, I didn’t really do that. But as the microphone was on the other side of the room, I did explain what the deal was in my very loud broadcast voice.

There is a tag known as the Q tag which is used for short quotes, to which you can append a CITE attribute, where you put the URL of the original author of the page in between the quotes. The specific purpose of this attribute is for someone who is quoting another web page to provide a citation (i.e. and acknowledgement) to the original author of the content. In addition, you can also use the CITE attribute with the BLOCKQUOTE tag for longer articles, such as larger paragraphs of content, and potentially an entire web page. Sounds great, right? If the CITE attribute works as advertised, you now have a cheap and simple way to syndicate content to other sites.

Problem is that the search engines don’t look at it. Witness the fact that the Google and Yahoo representatives on the panel had never heard about it. In addition, I asked Matt Cutts about the CITE attribute about 6 months ago, and until I mentioned it, he had never heard about it either. I pushed the question on Matt 3 different times because I had a major client that was thinking of using this in their syndication strategy.

Matt has since provided me sufficient assurance that this attribute is not used by Google. So don’t rely on it!

So now that I am done with the state of the state on this point – shouldn’t the search engines support this attribute? What a wonderful idea! A simple and straightforward way for someone who is syndicating content to acknowledge the original author. This would provide a simple way for publishers and their syndication partners to clearly label legitimately syndicated (duplicate) content on the web.

WebmasterWorld Day 1

Brutal trip out here. No problems really, everything ran on time. But getting up at 4:30 am ET to come out here is hard no matter how you slice it.

But anyway, I have made it our to WebmasterWorld in Las Vegas. And as always, it’s an entertaining show. Since I flew early this morning, I made only the two last sessions. The most interesting one to me was the CSS and HTML session.

According to Ted Ulle, it makes a big difference in site readability and user comprehension if you use CSS to set line height rules. The default spacing used by today’s browsers is 1 line of space between each line of text. Usability studies have shown that the best results are achieved when you set this to 1.25 links of space between lines of text. Apparently, this is something that has been well known in the typographic industry for decades.

Better still, it’s easy to address in your CSS file. Ted also told us that he has seen this affect conversion rates on sites by as much as 20%!

Well shoot, that one may just be worth a try …

Google Custom Search Engines and Core Search

Gary Price put up a post on Wednesday where he speculated that Google’s plan to focus on core search were just stories. Gary cites the move into radio ads, the Custom Search Engine announcement, and the YouTube acquisition as being divergent from this plan.

Lisa Barone at BruceClay.com speculates further on this topic. Lisa’s take is that the plan to increase the focus on core products is still real. Lisa offers the opinion that we should NOT interpret Google’s statements about a core search focus as meaning NO new products.

I think Gary and Lisa both raise some good points. What I would like to add to the discussion is my thoughts on how Custom Search Engines fit into core search.

We recently published an interview with Google’s Shashi Seth, and then did an analysis of the program in our blog.

In our blog analysis, we discuss what we learned in our interview with Shashi, which is that the whole Google Co-Op initiative (which includes Custom Search Engines) is focused on solving problems in core search. The specific issue being addressed by the Custom Search Engine program is that the context of the use is not known. For example, if they search on “cancer” are they a patient looking for treatment information, or a doctor looking for research data.

Custom Search Engines help address this because human editors can create vertically oriented search engines that are targeted at these groups. For example here is a search engine for patients and here is a search engine for doctors. By testing them out, you can see how different the results are.

It’s my belief that Google views the Custom Search Engine program as part of their focus on core search. The reasoning behind the product was to address a shortcoming in core search. In addition, the engineering team that worked on this project is fully integrated with the rest of the core search engineering team. I would expect that more products will come out of this group over time as well.

del.icio.us tags: , , , ,

Webmaster World Next Week

Like many others in the search engine industry, I am preparing for the trip to Las Vegas for WebmasterWorld. There are lots of things to look forward to. Catching up with the many people in this industry that I have to know. Just hanging out in some place warmer than Boston.

Then there are the many great sessions and meetings I plan to go to. For me, these events are about networking, building new relationships, and renewing relationships.

I plan to arrive on Tuesday morning. Sessions that interest me are:

  1. Feeds and Other Alternative Optimization Opportunities
  2. CSS and HTML Coding Today
  3. Search Blog and Reporter Forum
  4. The Thursday morning at 9:00 am keynote by Danny Sullivan
  5. Press and Public Relation Campaigns
  6. Viral and WOMM Marketing Management
  7. Search Engine Smackdown

During the next week, all our posts will focus on WebmasterWorld related reports. Hope to see you there!