Link Building Research Tip

One of the things that is critical in doing link building work is developing tricks for finding the right contact info. Here is the scenario:

  1. You have backlinked your competitor
  2. You have identified the high value pages that link to them
  3. You now need to figure out how to contact that site and get a link to yours
  4. You visit the page to see if you can figure out who might be responsible for deciding who the link to

Of course, it is only a small percentage of the time that such pages identify the person you need to contact. You often need to fish around a bit to find the right contact. You may need to look at a “contact us” page, or some other such page that contains more general information.

Regardless of all this, one scenario that happens a lot is that you learn who authored or updated the page last, yet no contact information is provided. You begin to fish around the site, trying to find that contact info, but can’t … sound familar?

Here is a simple tip. Let’s assume the person is named John Smith, and the site they work for is “theirdomain.com”. As soon as you decide that John Smith is the right contact, stop all your searching by hand, and go to your favorite search engine and type in “john smith” site:theirdomain.com.

If the email address is published on the site you will have that answer in less than 1 second. Chances are pretty good that it will be sitting there on the search results page and you won’t even need to click through to the site to find it.

Got a tip of your own? Let me know and we will publish it.

Latest Interview: Alex Chudnovsky

I recently did an interview with Alex Chudnovsky of Majestic SEO. After my recent interview with Rand Fishkin about Linkscape Alex contacted me to discuss his backlinking tool. Majestic SEO offers a competing tool to Linkscape, and therefore it made for an interesting discussion. It looks like this market is heating up!

Latest Interview: Eric Ward

This week’s interview is with Eric Ward, aka Link Moses, the person with arguably the longest running history of link building of anyone in the business. Eric and I focused the conversation on the process of reaching major influencers. If you are shooting for the big time with your web site, then reaching the major influencers is a must. Check out the interview to see Eric’s ideas on how to do that.

Latest Interview: Yahoo’s Larry Cornett

This week’s interview is with Dr. Larry Cornett, the VP of the Yahoo Search consumer products division. Our discussion focused on SearchMonkey, Yahoo’s new effort to remap the user experience in search.

We talked in particular about Yahoo’s recent announcement that certain SearchMonkey applications have been defaulted to on for all search users. Personally, I think that this is big news, as it is a bold step in the direction of giving individual publishers a great deal of control over their listings in the search results.

Check the interview out, and then come back here to talk about it.

Cost Per Link Is A Bad Metric

Talk about bad metrics, cost per link is one of the worst. Let’s talk about why, but first, I am going to outline how it comes up.

Typically what happens is that an SEO is performing work on behalf of a client, or the company they work for. They are diligently adding the links. Then the person managinf the SEO does a calculation, looking at the money spent on the SEO, and the number of links acquired.

For example, if you have an in house SEO getting paid $8000 per month, and they obtained 40 links for you last month, your cost per link is $200. So why not try to drive this cost per link metric down?

The reason is that it will drive you to acquire crappier and crappier links. If you tell the SEO to get you links at a cost per link of $100, they are going to start looking for easier and easier ways to do it.

What the metric ignores is that all links are not created equal. In fact, a high quality link can easily be 10,000, or even 100,000, times more valuable to your web site then one of those crappy links. Looking at cost per link as a metric then could lead you to focus on getting 1,000 crappy links, instead of one really good one, which is a big mistake (we advocate mix of quantity and quality by the way).

Let’s look at the major factors influencing a link’s value to your web site:

  1. Raw link juice of the linking page as crudely estimated by Google’s PageRank score
  2. Trust level of the linking domain, as very crudely estimated by Google’s PageRank score of the home page of that domain
  3. Relevance of the domain
  4. Relevance of the linking page
  5. Anchor text of the link itself
  6. Number of links on the linking page

One idea would be to try and create a more precise calculation of the link’s value. Since PageRank is a logarithmic scale, you can do the following math: Link Value = (10 ** PageRank) / Number of links on the page. Just to illustrate, if you have a page with PageRank 6, that has 123 outbound links, you get a score of 8130.081 for your link value.

This is a crude measurement, but it is certainly better than cost per link. However, this metric ignores other important factors such as the trust level of the linking domain, the relevance related factors, and the anchor text, and these are very, very important factors.

So if you are looking to measure the results of your link building campaign, stay away from cost per link. You can try the refined version that calculates link value as a metric, and that has some merit to it, but you still need to consider the other factors, based on a manual review of the links.