The New Bing Interface With Stefan Weitz

The new Bing interface is aimed at bringing you clean and decisive search results while helping you interact with your friends and network for a holistic search experience. In this interview, Stefan Weitz from Bing talks about the functionality of the new Bing, how it came about, and plans for its future.

Key Points

  1. The web has gone through a kind of seismic shift. Whereas before, it was all based primarily on text and links, there is now the ability to remodel the world in digital.
  2. In ethnographic studies, 68% of people told Bing that they were trying to actually do something with search, rather than just find information.
  3. During the studies, Bing also found that many people take information from the web and bring it to friends and family offline to help in decision-making.
  4. Sidebar is Bing’s social product, and attempts to take the offline action of engaging people in decision-making, and actually bring that into the online sphere.
  5. Sidebar not only brings people you know into search in a more natural way, it is actually able to show you people that you don’t even know that might be able to help you with your query.
  6. The goal is to make offline more visible online, and actually make that more efficient and effective in helping you do stuff.
  7. A majority of the people Bing studied said that search has gotten too complicated, and that they expect search to be able to organize and make sense of the information more effectively.
  8. Snapshot will take a lot of the tasks out of finding information on the web by actually organizing and summarizing information directly on the search result page.
  9. Bing’s entity engine has about three hundred and ten million objects in it right now, ranging from wine bottles to celebrities and artists.
  10. Bing prefers partnering with 3rd party services rather than trying to build or acquire them.
  11. Bing is currently working with Facebook, Twitter, Quora, LinkedIn, Foursquare, and Google+ in an attempt to make the most inclusive area for social activity on the web.

Full Interview Transcript

Eric Enge: Can you give me an overview of the new Bing announcement?

Stefan Weitz: As we have talked about before, the web has gone through a seismic shift. Where it used to be based primarily on text and links, it now more closely models the world in digital format. 5 billion social networking things are happening each day. The geospatial stuff clearly is a huge area because we now have gone past just buildings and streets and have moved into literally modeling all the stuff that we can touch, see, feel, and interact with into some digital format.

There are also a million plus applications across all the platforms, and these intelligently help you do something by understanding what it is you are talking about in the real world and linking that to a service or application which can help you do that. That is really where search has to go because search is really predicated on the structure of the web. That is the background for this big release. It is trying to create an experience that allows us to actually model or reflect that new reality of the web and reflect how people get things done in real life.

snapshot, which is what we call the center pane, is really catering to the fact that 68% of the people told us that they were trying to actually do something with search, not just find out information, which is a big shift from even a few years ago. And then, as far as sidebar is concerned, which is what we call the social section on the right rail of the page, that really came from watching how people were using social data to make decisions and to do things. We did lots of offline studies and went into people’s homes to see how they were doing things.


New Bing sidebar


I remember sitting there one day and seeing this woman who spent hours and hours searching and printing out web pages about hotels and other travel options, and binding them in a three-ring binder and taking them to her husband to help her decide where they would go on vacation that year. At first I thought she was a complete outlier. Then we started looking at how other folks were using search. They did not all print out and bind the results, but some put the information in an email, or bookmarked pages, or copied information into notepad. What emerged was this notion of using search to do research and get information, but ultimately they were not able to take an action until they were able to validate it with a human.

And, that’s where the sidebar came in. Sidebar says: How can we take the offline action of engaging people in decision-making and actually bring that into the online sphere? I was talking about it a few weeks ago and we were going back and forth on how to talk about this. I said, I equate this to the transformation that occurred when you look at US Mail versus email.

US Mail is a very solid, reliable, offline process, that has always been somewhat inefficient. Email came along and added an efficiency to the entire process.

We think of sidebar the same way. Sidebar not only brings people into search in a more natural way, it enables us to actually show you people that you don’t even know who might be able to help you with your query. That’s the big problem, is that I may know that you were a part of the Phoenix BIOS Team but Joe may not. Now, Joe does a search for Phoenix BIOS and suddenly sees in sidebar that Eric Enge was one of the guys that was a part of that.

Well, he would have never known to ask you that question because he doesn’t know you well enough

The point is that it can expose you to information about your network that you may not have known. For example, I lived in Australia for three years. I built model rockets when I was a kid. These are the things you didn’t know.

Because of the proliferation of social data that people are putting online and tagging, suddenly the system is going to actually make those connections, where before that was impossible. It is the notion of bringing the offline online and actually making that more efficient and more effective in helping you do stuff.

Eric Enge: Estes Rockets by chance?

Stefan Weitz: Indeed, Estes Rockets with Double D engines I liked to use the big huge ones.

Eric Enge: Yeah of course, that’s what I did too. So anyway, that’s a great example.

Stefan Weitz: That’s the theory behind what you are seeing here in this new Bing experience. That pane now is really focused on presenting what search knows in a very clean interface so there is not a lot of distraction.

Most people were saying the social stuff was too distracting. Around 72% of the people we talked to actually said that search has gotten too complicated. 84% of the people actually said that they expect search to be able to organize and make sense of this information more effectively.

So, that’s what led to what you see now. The results are much cleaner than they used to be, there is more spacing, we have a nice gutter on the left hand side, and it is far easier to scan the interface.

People are saying: “You have all this data, you understand all these services, you understand this new web of social data and applications and objects, do something with that.”

What snapshot is going to let us do, is actually know that Hotel Max is a hotel and offer a bunch of data about that hotel, including where it is at, reviews, photos and even the ability to go ahead and check rates on that particular place right here.

snapshot allows us to take a lot of the doing tasks and actually organize and summarize those things in a way that helps you interact directly on the page.

snapshot also tries to address the second big complaint we heard which was: there is too much data, you should do a better job of organizing this data.

Another good example I think actually is something like this for restaurants:

If I search for “San Francisco Italian”, it is a fairly ambiguous query, but it is not too bad. Bing will detect that it is likely a restaurant type query and add filters at the top that allow you to filter through your web results.


New Bing San Francisco Italian Search Results


Also, as I scroll down, I can actually see the Italian restaurants. I get reviews, a map, hours, street view, and I can see the inside using a service called <a href=” http://www.everyscape.com/ “>EveryScape</a>. I can also book a reservation online through Open Table.

We partner with 3rd party services instead of trying to build or acquire them. There are probably something like a million apps out there today.

I talk to probably two dozen start-ups every week that are doing different cool things on the web. To think that we are ever going to be able to actually beat them, or out-execute them (when they are talking about 12 guys with half a million angel funding building some really interesting apps), it is just not likely.

We are trying to make snapshot the place where we integrate other people’s services and drive them traffic has tremendous value both to developers, but also of course to the users who can now actually do something with these algorithm results versus just clicking on and hope that it gets to a decent page.

Here is another good example using the search query “BMW 5 series”.


New Bing BMW Search Results


snapshot pulls in the official BMW website and data from other sites. We know about the BMW 5 series, the type of car, reviews, price, etc. We can go look at our entity engine and have compete information about the product.

What we have done here is literally take a bunch of data from across the web and re-associate it back with the entity from which it came. That’s a fundamental difference. Another example is Coldplay:


New Bing Coldplay Search Results


In the right rail, snapshot pops up and I get all their events.

We know Coldplay is a band, we know bands have events, we know events have times and places and we can again stitch all those things together in real time to augment the algorithm. Snapshot is only going to become more powerful over time as we do more and more of this integration.

The entity engine that we have currently has about three hundred and ten million objects in it right now. That being said, there are probably a hundred times that many entities in the actual planet, so we are aggressively building on it as fast as we can.

Eric Enge: What percentage of queries do you think you are addressing at this point?

Stefan Weitz: We are talking low numbers. You are not going to get a ton of the things here because they are scoped pretty much to restaurants, hotels, movies and events, people, and cars. They are all pretty high frequency queries and you will see it, but you won’t see it for every query yet.

Eric Enge: What about sidebar?

Stefan Weitz:

What sidebar is doing is allowing you to more effectively bring offline behavior online. I can enter a query on Coldplay and have a section in the right rail called “friends who might know.”

In this case we are looking at just Facebook friends and we are analyzing their public profiles, likes, shares, where they have lived, and photos. We are trying to see if any of these things give a hint, that potentially one of these people has information about your query.

The idea here is that I can literally now engage friends in conversations. I can go ahead and click on a friend and ask “hey, do you know when Coldplay’s new album is coming out?”

Eric Enge: You can pick who to ask which is nice.

Stefan Weitz: Yes. What is cool here is that that it will go out to Facebook, onto my wall, and all my friends will see it in their news feed, and the friends that I ask will receive the question as a message. As they answer my question, if I hover over in the activity feed, I will see their answers.

The other piece in sidebar is called “people who know.” In many queries, you may end up with no friends that know anything about what it is you are querying on. We want to invoke the wider web and we want to actually utilize data and social data from across the wider web to get you information on your query.

We can actually find Coldplay’s official Google Plus profile and put it there. Now you don’t have to know this person obviously, but it enables us to actually look across a number of different social data sources and attempt to find expertise and influence for those topics. In this case we think the Coldplay Google Plus page is the best page for that.

Eric Enge: Now presumably I won’t be able to message them directly because we are not yet connected, right?

Stefan Weitz: You can’t message them directly, no.

Eric Enge: Right.That makes sense of course because otherwise you would be flooding all these people with all kinds of communications and that would be ugly.

Stefan Weitz: Exactly, here is a cool example that really highlights the power of combining those two:

For San Francisco Italian restaurants, I may not have any friends who have any opinions about them. But, look what has happened.


New Bing Social Results


Bing has literally gone out and found people who have blogs and Twitter accounts that we think are influential about San Francisco Bay Area Italian restaurants. I can also literally scroll down and see people’s reviews on Italian restaurants in San Francisco.

Suddenly, I go from a lot of pages and links to nouns, to one where Bing is able to find a small blogger in San Francisco called FoodNut who happens to have data about San Francisco Italian restaurant entities. It is a fundamental shift in search.

Eric Enge: What are the social networks you support?

Stefan Weitz: We are currently working with Facebook, Twitter, Quora, LinkedIn, Foursquare, Google+ and Blogger. Our goal is to make this right rail, the right sidebar, the most inclusive area for social activity on the web. Four Square check-ins may actually be more interesting for me when I am looking for good seafood in Boston There is a bunch of cool stuff that we are going to enable in that right sidebar as we incorporate more of the social data in.

Another example is Windows 8. I can see people who know about Windows 8. Here I get Paul, I get Mary Joe and their Twitter accounts.


New Bing Windows 8 Results


I am seeing their actual tweets about Windows 8 and a set of reviews.

Eric Enge: Right.

Stefan Weitz: It is focused on understanding the real world that we live in and helping to do things in that. It is focus on connecting people to those queries and letting you engage with those people in a way that helps you do things and it builds your network.

Eric Enge: Very cool. I imagine you have done some live user testing with this?

Stefan Weitz: Thousands of tests were run on the left hand side on the new page (from fonts to color to spacing to caption lengths.)

For snapshot, we have done a lot of testing. I don’t think we have any real great data on that except for the fact that people appreciate being able to take action from that. I think the challenge we are going to have, frankly, is to get people to understand what to do with all of the features

On sidebar, we do a lot of work to understand what is the most interesting set of data to bring in there.

The right rail is going to take a bit of a user shift because they aren’t used to seeing that in search today. They are used to the way we used to have it, the way Google currently has it. Here it is about having the ability to do the same thing and get things there as well.

Eric Enge: So, did you end up getting a richer data set from Facebook in order to implement this?

Stefan Weitz: No, it’s what our agreement currently covers. It is public Likes, it is public profile data. What we have to do with Facebook is make sure that our Service Level Agreements are good so when somebody does post something or take something down, updates come very quickly.

If you “unlike” something in the old days, and didn’t catch it for five minutes, it wasn’t the end of the world. Here, if someone shares something they didn’t mean to share, being able to make sure that is deleted quickly is important.

It is important to also remember that this right rail, the sidebar, really is open. You can’t author into it today, but the whole point is that we are going to be including all these additional social networks and all the additional social signals.

Eric Enge: Was Facebook involved in any way in the development of this or consulted with it?

Stefan Weitz: Yeah, they definitely were consulted. We showed them the early mock ups, along with other partners that we had that were involved, there were no surprises, let us put it that way. I know the folks who work at Facebook are pretty excited to see it roll out.

Eric Enge: Are you actually in touch with Google Plus development team or…?

Stefan Weitz: We are actually just crawling that. They don’t offer an API anyway so it wouldn’t be really easy.

Eric Enge: Do you have access to the LinkedIn data through the API as well?

Stefan Weitz: I don’t think we have even gotten down to how we are going to be using that honestly. I don’t know.

Eric Enge: For the other services, do you do it by crawl?

Stefan Weitz: It is just going to depend on what we want to do with the data and how fast it needs to be done. Crawling is not going to be very effective on check-ins, for example, for Four Square. With Quora, it is not necessarily critical real time data, so it might be effective to crawl

Eric Enge: So when do you think this will be generally available?

Stefan Weitz: Well today, if you go to Bing.com/new you can opt in and get it today. Then, at the beginning of June-ish timeframe (I am not sure we have actually locked on that date) it should be available more generally.

Eric Enge: Right. Well, that’s very cool. The experiment with the social stuff is particularly interesting I am going to be really interested to see how this plays out for you in the market. Thanks Stefan!

Stefan Weitz: Thank you Eric!

Personalization In Google Search Results With Bruce Clay

Today’s post is focused on a hot topic in search: Personalization. Personalization is Google’s attempt to personalize search results based on a variety of individual factors, including web history, social connections, and much more.

In the following video, Eric interviews Bruce Clay of Bruce Clay, Inc. gives his thoughts on Google and personalization:

Key Points

  1. Web history has existed for 5 years, and Google uses this information to tailor search results to individuals.
  2. Google is trying to overcome ambiguity. When you search for a term like “hammer,” what do you mean?
  3. Two people might be searching for the same word and get different results, depending on their location and web search history.
  4. While personalization may lead to less false positive results (and therefore lower total site traffic), it also leads to more highly targeted visitors to your website. This can actually increase conversion rates as a percentage of search traffic in some cases.
  5. In some cases, personal history may give Google incorrect signals, and actually increase the amount of false positives.
  6. Ranking is no longer the best way to track SEO efforts, as ranking will vary from person to person.
  7. In the past, SEO professional’s were optimizing around one word, whereas in the future, they will have to optimize for communities.

Full Interview Transcript

Eric Enge, CEO, Founder, Stone Temple Consulting: Hi, I’m Eric Enge with Stone Temple Consulting. We are an internet marking optimization firm that does SEO, paid search, social media, and a variety of other things for fun.

I’m here today with Bruce Clay. We are going to take on an interesting topic, which is that of personalization. But, Bruce, why don’t you introduce yourself for us?

Bruce Clay, President, Founder, Bruce Clay, Inc.: Thank you. Bruce Clay Inc. We’ve been in business since January of 1996. We focus on internet marketing optimization. That is: SEO, PPC, analytics, social conversion, and information architecture.

We sponsor a lot of conferences that many people probably have gone to. I am sure at one point or another they’ve had a drink ticket with my name on it. So, that’s an important networking activity we support.

Eric Enge: You know how to make friends.

Bruce Clay: I do. Certainly, sponsoring drinks is one sure-fire way of doing it. It’s the ultimate social media platform at a conference.

Eric Enge: Right!

Bruce Clay: So, we do that. We have offices internationally and we’re (centrally) located in Southern California.

Eric Enge: Awesome! So, today we wanted to talk, like I said, about personalization a bit.

Boy, there are a lot of dimensions to that. But we’re going to try to hit the high points here, I guess, and maybe you could give me your sense of what personalization involves at Google today and where you think it might go.

Personalized Search Results Option

Bruce Clay: Personalization is a little bit like the blind man and the elephant. No matter what part of the elephant you touch, it looks like a different kind of an animal. Unless you see the whole thing, you don’t know it’s an elephant. I think personalization fits into that.

I think, in the beginning, Google had; well, if you remember back, Google had 10 blue links, one algorithm, one-size-fits-all, no matter where you were in the world you got the same 10 results.

For about five years, they’ve been attempting to auto-localize. They’ve been attempting to look at your web history and web history has existed for about five years.

I think the impact on search results has been growing over time, but I have slides in my training course where we talk about web history from five years ago. I have samples of those slides.

What I think has been going on is Google has been fighting the battle against something called ambiguity. Ambiguity is where somebody puts in a word and Google doesn’t know what you meant.

What I really like is my example for a search for “hammer.” Now, we all know what a hammer is. But if you search for hammer in Google, the number one result is a vitamin. The number two result is the Armand Hammer art museum at UCLA. And the number three result is a bowling ball known as “The Hammer.” Number four is Wikipedia, number five is MC Hammer. Nowhere in there are you really dealing with striking instruments.

Personalized Search Results For Hammer

But, they didn’t know what you meant by “hammer.” Now, we can keep going. Guns have hammers. Pianos have hammers. I mean, there’s a lot of different things going on. So, Google has attempted to give you nutrition and art and sports. The best hammer in each of them, because they’re the popular categories.

Well, that ambiguity becomes a problem for Google. So, where web history is played, and this personalization, is they’ve started to look at where are you and what have you previously searched for? So, if I search for equipment and tools and pliers and screwdrivers and then hammer, they’re gonna know what kind of hammer I’m likely looking for.

Eric Enge: Right.

Bruce Clay: Personalization, then, has migrated us from the 10 blue links one-size-fits-all to something that is individualized. It is what I want, based on what I searched for in front of it. And that personalization is changing the top 10 results for each individual, even if they search for the same word.

Now, the good news is, if somebody actually does go to my site for hammer, it’s going to be a more targeted visitor. The bad news is, I’m not going to get as many false positives, if you will; people that will find my site my site when they didn’t really want the tool.

Eric Enge: Right. A little less serendipity.

Bruce Clay: Yeah. So, my traffic is going to drop, but my conversion, perhaps, won’t. And my conversion as a percentage may actually improve.

So, I think Google is using personalization as a way to address “how do I better target the search results by eliminating ambiguity?” And I think that’s really part of the battle.

Eric Enge: Right. Well, that makes a lot of sense.

On January 10th, actually, we got the Search Plus Your World update from Google, which introduced a new level of personalization to search results, didn’t it?

Example of Search Plus Your World

Bruce Clay: Yes. I refer to it as Search Rocks Your World. There were so many things that changed that people saw dips in traffic. A lot of ecommerce sites saw the traffic drop without actually seeing a conversion change, which is what I had alluded to. But they immediately freaked out because of the traffic drop. Now, I think that that’s a natural kind of a thing.

But I’ll tell you where the problem comes in, is that nobody knows how to get rid of web history. That means that I’m getting even more false positives. If I search for baby gifts because one of my employees had a baby, and then I search, because I’m going to a conference in Las Vegas, if I search for Las Vegas hotels the last thing I want is Las Vegas hotels catering to babies. Trust me. That’s not what I’m after.

So, you know, it could backfire on me finding results, and we’ve heard many people; many people indicate that the Google results are not any better; that they’re actually worse.

I think that one of the reasons they’re worse is that they’re using mixed queries. They’re searching for this gift and then that destination and then this travel means, and the signals are actually creating false positives. And I think that makes it a little bit harder.

The other thing you have to understand is, you know, when Google does all this, the intent is to improve. They don’t always get to improve.

Eric Enge: Right. It’s not as simple as you might think it is. Just because we can take one scenario and design an algorithm for that, we need to remember it’s being designed for, really, literally billions of scenarios.

Ambiguity in Search Terms

Bruce Clay: Yeah. How do you anticipate what somebody would have searched for before they searched for your keyword?

Eric Enge: Right. And I think when I interviewed Google’s Jack Menzel last, one of the things that he commented on is that is exactly one of the reasons why they don’t reach that far back into the web history and they keep it fairly localized just to try to minimize some of the fallout from that kind of problem.

Bruce Clay: But it also impacts the ability to use, for instance, in SEO, a lot of people using ranking as a determining factor of how well am I doing.

And unless you have an apples and apples and apples way of determining ranking, it turns out that you can say “I’m in position five” and everybody else sees you in position 20. They don’t even see you at all. So, it does mess up the SEO methodology a little bit.

Eric Enge: Yes, it does.

Any other thoughts that we should add on personalization before we finalize?

Bruce Clay: Well, I think that personalization is being comingled with other things. I think we’re gonna see it actually change the way pay-per-click works as a part of that algorithm.

You know, Google makes money on pay-per-click. They obviously want that to work.

We know that localization is occurring in the Google Places realm. Places was occasional, then it’s 30 percent, and now I expect it, within a year and a half, two years, to be 70 percent of all queries that have places on them.

Auto-localization is happening. I think that SEO becomes harder. I think that we as search engine optimization professionals have got to understand and wrap our head around the persona of the actual target.

We try to anticipate the keywords that they’re going to use and then content has to be changed. So many people for so long have written content around one keyword, not around a community. And I think that that change is going to impact how the whole world optimizes for traffic. And I expect it to be a very exciting period.

Eric Enge: Well, that’s awesome. That’s a big thought to leave this off on, but actually a really good one for people to think about.

Thanks for taking the time to be with us today, Bruce.

Bruce Clay: Thank you.

AdWords Spam Fighting Methods with Google’s David Baker

Key Points

  1. In 2011 Google had billions of ads that were submitted. Of these, roughly 130 million ads and 800,000 advertiser accounts were disapproved/suspended for violations of policy.
  2. Some of the spam problem is handled algorithmically while some is assisted with manual review. The system is constantly under work and revision.
  3. One of the biggest areas of bad ads is counterfeit. In 2011, of the 800,000 advertisers, 150,000 were for counterfeit violations.
  4. Of the counterfeit removals, 95% were proactive measures that Google has in place and 5% were from user complaints.
  5. Economic downturn gives way to new scams, as people are looking to save money and thus are easily tricked into deceptive billing practices or schemes.
  6. Bad ads are attacked with a 3 pronged approach:
    1. Looking for bad ad text or landing pages.
    2. Looking at sites in an industry, agnostic of which advertiser is advertising the site, to see if there is a whole class of policy that is being violated.
    3. Looking at individual advertising accounts (all of the ads and everything they advertise)
  7. The account review portion has a Risk Model where Google predicts the risk of a certain account to violate policy based on account history and a variety of account signals.
  8. Many complaints are from users reporting their competitors after they have been banned.

Continue Reading…

Link Pruning is the Key to Addressing Penguin

With today’s post I am happy to announce the launch of the Stone Temple Consulting YouTube Channel. And, we are kicking that off with a video interview I did with Bruce Clay on a hot topic – link pruning. As you probably know, Google’s recent Penguin update focused on lowering rankings for sites that use questionable link building practices.

This is a hot topic! If you have been hit by Penguin, or are worried about future variations of the algorithm, this is a video you can’t miss. In fact, regardless of your current situation, pruning the worst links out of your profile is a rock solid idea.

Key Points

  1. Link pruning refers to the identification and removal of unnatural, non-organic, or generally spammy links from a link profile.
  2. In many cases, questionable link building tactics (buying links, spamming links) can result in an eventual loss of rankings.
  3. In the event of a loss of rankings (or warning from Google) due to unnatural link profiles, it sometimes makes sense to investigate a link profile, find the low quality links, and send requests to their webmasters for removal.
  4. Many times, getting a link removed from a webmaster can be as difficult, if not more difficult, then getting the link in the first place.
  5. The key to this process is persistence and communication with Google.
  6. Sometimes, the best you can do is send a list of the links you are trying to remove, and ask Google to discount them. Showing an effort to Google is always a good plan of action.
  7. When removing links, don’t expect to return to your pre-penalty rankings. You must replace the spammy links that were detected with quality links, which can sometimes be a lengthy process.
  8. Link pruning should be considered every month. Ask yourself: What is the bottom 5 percent of links that I have in terms of quality? How can I remove these and replace them with quality links?

Continue Reading…