Archive for the ‘Page Rank’ Category

The Disproportionate Value of Deep Links

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

The impact of a few deep links appears be greater than what you might first expect. In today’s post I am going to explore why that may be the case, and how to leverage it. First let me go into my theory on the matter. For this example, let’s assume we have a high PR home page (PR7, 8 or 9). Let’s say it has 3 layers of content, consisting of an upper layer (categories), a 2nd layer (sub-categories) and a 3rd layer (detailed content).

If we apply the traditional PageRank algorithm, even the 2nd layer and 3rd layer pages should be somewhat competitive because they receive of PageRank from the rest of the site, but there are a lot of times when this does not seem to happen. It looks like the domain authority and trust is not distributed across a site in the same manner as pure PageRank. My theory is that this is caused by a filtering mechanism, which restricts the way that the lower layer pages on a site can accumulate the trust and authority of the domain.

Perhaps the page has a potential amount of link juice it can receive from its own domain, but if the page does not get any links on its own, then not all of that link juice is credited to the page. Here is an illustration showing what I mean :

Filtering Link Juice

When you get a deep link to a 2nd layer or 3rd layer page, our testing at STC shows that it has a much bigger impact than you might expect. Even a relatively low value link seems to bring large benefits to the ranking and traffic potential of the page, beyond what you would expect the value of the link to be. This may be because in addition to the link juice of the link, it also enables more of the link juice available to the page from the domain to be passed through, as shown here:

Impact of a Deep Link

And as you add more links the affect becomes more pronounced, as shown here.

Impact of Multiple Deep Links

Summary

Chances are the the actual algorithms that result in the behavior we have observed over time are actually quite different in concept from what I have outlined here, but this mental model of the value of a deep link does work for our purposes. When you have a 2nd, 3rd, or deeper layer page that you want to push in the rankings for competitive terms, you don’t necessarily need to get it hundreds of links. Just a few links will provide the page with benefits on a much larger scale than you might otherwise think.

Is Google Going to Expand its Punishments of Paid Links?

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

Search Engine Roundtable put up a post yesterday asking Are SEOs Still Buying Links?. Based on this post, I thought I would update my thoughts on whether or not SEOs will continue to purchase paid links. First though, let’s start with some poll data from Barry at Search Engine Roundtable. The post starts by presenting the output of a poll on the topic of Buying Links at the Digital Point Forums. Here is the data from the Digital Point Poll:

  • No – I never bought links and never will (27) – 39.71%
  • No – The Google Penalization Scare Me! (6) – 8.82%
  • Yeah – It’s Still Working Well For Me (30) – 44.12%
  • Yeah – But I have reduced my spending just in case. (5) – 7.35%

Barry also offers up a simpler poll in his post. The question asked was “Are You Still Buying Links?”, and the results from that are as follows:

  • Yes (52) – 64%
  • No (26) – 32%
  • Other (3) – 4%

As you can see, a large percentage of respondents in Barry’s poll indicate that they still buy links (64%). This is much larger than the data indicated by the Digital Point Forums where 48% indicated that they don’t buy links. In rough terms we can interpret the data to tell us that 50% to 65% of SEOs buy links.

The Digital Point Forums data on the Google Penalization scaring SEOs suggests that only about 9% of respondents were affected. This does not surprise me at all. As I noted in my post 3 Surprises in the Google PageRank Update, a large sea change in link buying behavior will only occur once material punishments are put into play.

Lowering toolbar PageRank, but doing nothing about rankings in the process will do nothing.

However, SEOs need to cast a wary eye in this direction. Certainly one step that Google can take easily is to discount the ability of sites that sell links to pass PageRank. This by itself will have a dramatic affect on the overall paid links ecosystem. This latest initiative will certainly encourage more active link reporting, particularly in terms of getting webmasters to report their competitors.

In addition, Google has already shown their willingness to fire warning shots. They have already adopted the practice of banning sites for 30 days for certain infractions as a warning shot. Then, if the site owner does not respond, they will take the next step. If you use purchased links as an SEO tactic in your business, this is something you need to worry about.

Using NoFollow to Manage PageRank flow.

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

Recently, in a conversation that Matt Cutts had with Rand Fishkin, Matt confirmed that Google does not see the use of NoFollow on your web sites as a spam tactic. Here are Matt’s exact words:

The nofollow attribute is just a mechanism that gives webmasters the ability to modify PageRank flow at link-level granularity. Plenty of other mechanisms would also work (e.g. a link through a page that is robot.txt’ed out), but nofollow on individual links is simpler for some folks to use. There’s no stigma to using nofollow, even on your own internal links

NoFollow in the Footer Nav

This raises some interesting possibilities for using this as a tool to concentrate PageRank in the places where you want to concentrate it. To see what we can do with this, let’s look at the SEOmoz blog’s footer navigation for an example:

SEOmoz Footer Nav

This is a fairly common looking footer. Note how the “About”, “Our Services”, “Our Clients”, and “Contact” links are in the footer nav, a design element that shows up on every page of the site. When you link to a pages from every page of your site, the search engine is likely to think that you are saying it’s one of your most important pages.

Clearly, from a business perspective, the “Contact” page is one of the most important pages on the site. However, there is no reason to expect that it will rank highly for important search terms, no matter how much link juice you give it. You may, or may not, want the page to be in the index, but you don’t need to spend tons of PageRank on pages that will never rank.

A good solution for this is to use the NoFollow attribute on these four links. Note that you do not want to use the NoFollow metatag, because this will prevent the entire page from passing any link juice to any other page. This is not your goal.

In theory, this should signal Google that these pages should not be getting any link juice from the other pages of the site. If you want the pages to still be in the index, take one page, such as the home page, and do not apply the NoFollow attribute in the links to these pages from the home page. As a result, the search engines will still see the pages.

NoFollow in the Main Nav

Another application of NoFollow pages comes in when you are dealing with sites that cross link between product categories. Let’s look at an example of this scenario:

Digital Camera HQ Nav

In this example using the Digital Camera HQ main navigation menu, you could imagine that the Price Range pages change a lot, and are not likely to rank highly in the engines no matter what you do. In addition, the cameras listed under Most Popular are key pages that you want to pass the most PageRank to.

Assuming that this is true, NoFollowing the links to the Price Range pages would be a smart idea. As a result, you would stop spending PageRank on those pages, and have more to allocate to the other pages in the main nav, such as the Most Popular, and the Camera Brand pages.

As before, if you still want the Price Range pages in the index, just not with so much link juice, then go ahead and find one page and link to it without the NoFollow attribute from the page. The home page is once again a great place to do this from.

Summary

Based on Matt’s statements to Rand, it seems like these strategies should work for your site. As with all things of this type in the SEO world, there is no real guarantee that this will help you, but, intuitively, it makes sense. In addition, given the care that Matt and other Googlers must take in their public statements, it seems likely that there is little risk in trying it out.

Page Rank, and Query Specific Page Rank

Thursday, July 5th, 2007

Page Rank gets a bad rap sometimes. It’s easy to understand why. People got obsessed with Page Rank a few years back, and for a long time, people would not let go of the notion that Page Rank was the only thing you needed to worry about in SEO. For that reason, many really smart SEOs started to downplay it greatly, and to suggest that Page Rank is meaningless.

But that’s over doing it. Page Rank is still very, very important, and I still use it.

Page Rank still provides the best way of measuring the importance of a page, or a site. So let’s step back for a minute and talk about what I mean by importance. For example, why is Amazon more highly ranked than Joe’s Book Store? Because Amazon has a lot more links (page rank). Ultimately, a search engine has to decide two things about each page, in response to each search query:

  1. How relevant is the page to the search query – they do this by textual analysis of the page, the site, and an analysis of the relevance of the inbound links (by analyzing the text on the linking page, and the text on the linking site, and the relevance of the links to the linking site). As you can see, this rapidly becomes a highly recursive process, that provides the best results if you do this on a search query by search query basis. You can think of every page on the web as having its own “relevance score” with respect to every single search query.
  2. How important the page is compared to other pages that are relevant to the search query – This is a page rank calculation, as filtered by the relevance of the inbound links. I think of this as “query specific page rank”. So if the query is “bananas”, and your page is about bananas, and you have an inbound link from a site about selling used cars, that link will not add very much to the importance score of your page for the query bananas. But if the inbound link is from a page about bananas, on a site about bananas, and uses the word bananas in the anchor text of the link, the inbound link will add a tremendous amount to the importance score of your page. The final kicker is an evaluation of the importance of the linking page and the linking site. One simple way to do that is to look at their page rank. To get really artful though, look at how it ranks in the SERPs for the query bananas. If it’s on the first page, you have a killer link. So with this notion of query specific page rank, you have a way of thinking about your linking strategy, and you are acknowledging that page rank is still at the core of that strategy

In SEOmoz’s Search Engine Ranking Factors survey of top SEOs, the top 3 ranking factors selected were:

  1. Keyword Use in Title Tag
  2. Anchor Text of Inbound Link
  3. Global Link Popularity of Site
  4. Age of Site
  5. Link Popularity within the Site’s Internal Link Structure
  6. Topical Relevance of Inbound Links to Site
  7. Link Popularity of Site in Topical Community
  8. Keyword Use in Body Text
  9. Global Link Popularity of Linking Site
  10. Rate of New Inbound Links to Site

Looking at this list, and our notion of “Query Specific Page Rank”, items 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 all fall into that category. That’s 7 out of 10 – not too shabby.

So, ultimately, page rank still counts for a lot. And when you adapt that thinking to thinking about Query Specific Page Rank, and relating it to the most important keywords for your site, you are really on the right track with your SEO strategy.

Page Rank Update Underway

Thursday, January 11th, 2007

Matt Cutts has confirmed that there is a Google Page Rank update underway. In addition, data returned by site:, link:, and info: commands are being updated as well.

As always, please bear in mind that Page Rank has very little influence on rankings. It’s most inportant impact is that it determines the crawl depth and frequency of crawls for your site. Of course, these are still pretty important things.

A better way to think about ranking is in terms of “Search Query Specific Page Rank”. In other words, for a search query such as “blue widgets”, what is the collective page rank of all the pages about blue widgets, or closely related topics that point to your page about blue widgets. For the search phrase “green widgets”, you need to do a completely independent evaluation.

Still, we all love metrics for our business, so we continue to want to know our page rank. Nothing wrong with that. Just don’t obsess over it!

List of PR9 and PR10 sites

Monday, December 18th, 2006

Looking for a list of high page rank sites? Here is a site that lists Page Rank 10 and Page Rank 9 sites. The list is not comprehensive, but it represents a great starting place for those of you who want to research the highest page rank sites to get links from.

As always, please keep in mind that relevance is king. But authority matters too, and it’s likely that a link from any site on this list will be seen as quite authoritative.

Also, double check the Page Rank values that you see for yourself. I saw some differences here when I checked a few. Of course, their can be variations depending on which Google server is feeding you data at the moment, and also over time.

Does Page Rank Matter?

Wednesday, October 4th, 2006

Matt Cutts did another update on Page Rank recently. This started the usual fire storm of questions related to Page Rank, and blog posts by others. One excellent post on the topic was made by Jim Boykin.

Jim makes the point that Page Rank has minimal direct impact in rankings. There are two things that Page Rank influences directly:

  1. Crawl Order – Google crawls the web in top down Page Rank order.
  2. Crawl Depth – Google allocates more “crawl budget” to higher Page Rank sites.

So Matt and Jim are right. Obsessing about page rank is a waste of time. It’s like checking the level of oil on your oil tank when you are really interested in knowing how warm it is in the house. Doesn’t help you.

However, I completely understand people’s interest in Page Rank. Smart business people set up systems for measuring their business. A former boss of mine used to refer to these as “dials and gages”. Measuring your business is a crucial part of running it well.

In the webmaster business, understanding how you are doing with Google is basic to long term success. After all Google has 50% or more market share, depending on which month’s reports you read. People want to know how they are doing with Google. And Page Rank is a very public gage of your Google progress.

So go ahead and look at your Page Rank. We do. However, don’t spend more than a few seconds a month on it. It’s a very crude measure of your progress with Google, and it does not directly influence rankings.

Spend your quality time examining your stats and logs to see the how people are coming to your site today. This will give you a very meaningful measurement of your progress with all the search engines (e.g. traffic, pages crawled, keywords used). If you don’t have a good stats package, then get one. It’s worth its weight in gold.

Spend your time analyzing who is linking to you, and how you can entice other people to link to you that will directly influence your rankings. Assuming a properly structured site with good content, links are the currency of improved rankings. This means learning how to identify the right links to improve your rankings, instead of getting links to improve your page rank. These are very different things.

Look at these two sets of metrics to make money. This is how the big money is made on the web. Look at Google Page Rank to get a warm fuzzy feeling whenever it goes up. This is how you get … well … warm fuzzy feelings.