<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webmaster Tools Shows Nofollow Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148</link>
	<description>Observations about the World of SEO and Internet Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lassaad</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148&#038;cpage=1#comment-15137</link>
		<dc:creator>lassaad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148#comment-15137</guid>
		<description>Liam, I tried this script but it did not work.
The problem with backlinks is not only follow or nofollow, there is another problem which is more than 700 oubound links.
The best free tool that can help you is: backlinkwatch.com will give you nofollow and the number of oubound links. But it takes time to give you results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liam, I tried this script but it did not work.<br />
The problem with backlinks is not only follow or nofollow, there is another problem which is more than 700 oubound links.<br />
The best free tool that can help you is: backlinkwatch.com will give you nofollow and the number of oubound links. But it takes time to give you results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148&#038;cpage=1#comment-10453</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148#comment-10453</guid>
		<description>There is an excellent greasemonkey script from Joost de Valk that colours the  not found red, strike-throughs the &quot;no follows&quot; and displays the PR in webmaster tools:
http://www.joostdevalk.nl/code/greasemonkey/gwt-external-links/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an excellent greasemonkey script from Joost de Valk that colours the  not found red, strike-throughs the &#8220;no follows&#8221; and displays the PR in webmaster tools:<br />
<a href="http://www.joostdevalk.nl/code/greasemonkey/gwt-external-links/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/code/greasemonkey/gwt-external-links/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148&#038;cpage=1#comment-10412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=148#comment-10412</guid>
		<description>Eric:

Matt Cutt&#039;s post about Webmaster Tool showing all known inbound link made it VERY clear that not all of the links shown have value.  He actually said, 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do not assume just because you see a backlink that it’s carrying weight. I’m going to say that again: Do not assume just because you see a backlink that it’s carrying weight. Sometime in the next year, someone will say “But I saw an insert-link-fad-here backlink show up in Google’s backlink tool, so it must count. Right?” And then I’ll point them back here, where I say do not assume just because you see a backlink that it’s carrying weight.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-provides-backlink-tool-for-site-owners/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric:</p>
<p>Matt Cutt&#8217;s post about Webmaster Tool showing all known inbound link made it VERY clear that not all of the links shown have value.  He actually said, </p>
<blockquote><p>Do not assume just because you see a backlink that it’s carrying weight. I’m going to say that again: Do not assume just because you see a backlink that it’s carrying weight. Sometime in the next year, someone will say “But I saw an insert-link-fad-here backlink show up in Google’s backlink tool, so it must count. Right?” And then I’ll point them back here, where I say do not assume just because you see a backlink that it’s carrying weight.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-provides-backlink-tool-for-site-owners/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-provides-backlink-tool-for-site-owners/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
