<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam Lasnik Clarifies Google Stance on Duplicate Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=99" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=99</link>
	<description>Observations about the World of SEO and Internet Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Lasnik&#8217;s Genius Post on Duplicate Content @ Google XML Sitemap Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=99&#038;cpage=1#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lasnik&#8217;s Genius Post on Duplicate Content @ Google XML Sitemap Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=99#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>[...] He also gives 10 unique recommendations for webmasters (which I won&#8217;t list here - go read it!) that are spot on. Way to go, Adam - more posts like this will make the Webmaster Central blog the must-read site in the space. Could we have asked for even more? As Eric Enge points out, certainly we could, but I&#8217;m not looking this gift horse in the mouth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He also gives 10 unique recommendations for webmasters (which I won&#8217;t list here &#8211; go read it!) that are spot on. Way to go, Adam &#8211; more posts like this will make the Webmaster Central blog the must-read site in the space. Could we have asked for even more? As Eric Enge points out, certainly we could, but I&#8217;m not looking this gift horse in the mouth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
