<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stone Temple Consulting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stonetemple.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stonetemple.com</link>
	<description>Holistic Internet Marketing Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Disproportionate Value of Deep Links by Eric Enge</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/the-disproportionate-value-of-deep-links/#comment-4859</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=491#comment-4859</guid>
		<description>Not a simple question!  Ultimately, at the end of the day, you do need to build great content that will drive the PageRank you need.  When you have that, the thoughts in this post will apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a simple question!  Ultimately, at the end of the day, you do need to build great content that will drive the PageRank you need.  When you have that, the thoughts in this post will apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Disproportionate Value of Deep Links by La Jolla Restaurants</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/the-disproportionate-value-of-deep-links/#comment-4843</link>
		<dc:creator>La Jolla Restaurants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=491#comment-4843</guid>
		<description>Excellent and very much informative post, but if the page rank is not higher , it does not go for the effective search engine optimization. How can i overcome it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent and very much informative post, but if the page rank is not higher , it does not go for the effective search engine optimization. How can i overcome it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Clarity on Reconsideration Requests from Tiffany Oberoi by Eric Enge</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/new-clarity-on-reconsideration-requests-from-tiffany-oberoi/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=741#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Alex!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Alex!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Clarity on Reconsideration Requests from Tiffany Oberoi by alex</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/new-clarity-on-reconsideration-requests-from-tiffany-oberoi/#comment-4739</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=741#comment-4739</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a successful reconsideration request  but it took 8 Months to complete the process, but now i am happy that i am back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a successful reconsideration request  but it took 8 Months to complete the process, but now i am happy that i am back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bounce Rate as a Ranking Signal by Jan Willem</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/bounce-rate-as-a-ranking-signal/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Willem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/blog/?p=195#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>Bounce rate is always hard to interpret right.

I.e. in Analytics if the visitor enters a page from the search engine and stays there for some time and then returns to the search page, analytics counts a bounce. Solution: trigger any kind of event happening on your page after for example 20 seconds (discussable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bounce rate is always hard to interpret right.</p>
<p>I.e. in Analytics if the visitor enters a page from the search engine and stays there for some time and then returns to the search page, analytics counts a bounce. Solution: trigger any kind of event happening on your page after for example 20 seconds (discussable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Time Quality Score Defined, with Google&#8217;s Frederick Vallaeys by Eric Enge</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/real-time-quality-score-with-frederick-vallaeys/#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/?p=997#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael - I don&#039;t have a Search Plus Your World interview lined up as yet, but hope to in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael &#8211; I don&#8217;t have a Search Plus Your World interview lined up as yet, but hope to in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Time Quality Score Defined, with Google&#8217;s Frederick Vallaeys by Michael Rurup Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/real-time-quality-score-with-frederick-vallaeys/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rurup Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/?p=997#comment-4496</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,

This is a brilliant post on quality score -I gotta say - read a lot about quality score to &#039;break the code&#039;, but should have started here instead :) . Answered a lot of my questions plus some. Are you doing a follow up in regards to &#039;search plus your world&#039; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,</p>
<p>This is a brilliant post on quality score -I gotta say &#8211; read a lot about quality score to &#8216;break the code&#8217;, but should have started here instead <img src='http://www.stonetemple.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . Answered a lot of my questions plus some. Are you doing a follow up in regards to &#8216;search plus your world&#8217; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Adwords Tools with Google&#8217;s Frederick Vallaeys by essay help</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/power-adwords-tools-with-googles-frederick-vallaeys/#comment-4306</link>
		<dc:creator>essay help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/?p=1185#comment-4306</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Google Does Personalization with Jack Menzel by Eric Enge</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/how-google-does-personalization-with-jack-menzel/#comment-4243</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Enge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/?p=1090#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark - great question.  There is an important limiting factor.  Say I am a fan of the Jacksonville Jaguars football team.  Over time Google will learn that my queries about Jaguars are about the football team.  So, in theory, all of the responses should be about the football team.  There are two problems with that:

1. There may come a day when I actually do want info on the animal, the operating system, or the guitar.

2. People LIKE serendipity.  It is important to user satisfaction with search that it can be used to discover new things.

So, I would say that the day you ask about is really, really far off.  That is my quick take on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark &#8211; great question.  There is an important limiting factor.  Say I am a fan of the Jacksonville Jaguars football team.  Over time Google will learn that my queries about Jaguars are about the football team.  So, in theory, all of the responses should be about the football team.  There are two problems with that:</p>
<p>1. There may come a day when I actually do want info on the animal, the operating system, or the guitar.</p>
<p>2. People LIKE serendipity.  It is important to user satisfaction with search that it can be used to discover new things.</p>
<p>So, I would say that the day you ask about is really, really far off.  That is my quick take on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Google Does Personalization with Jack Menzel by Mark Collier</title>
		<link>http://www.stonetemple.com/how-google-does-personalization-with-jack-menzel/#comment-4237</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Collier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stonetemple.com/?p=1090#comment-4237</guid>
		<description>Great interview with a lot of interesting information.

Question on one thing: &quot;Since you are trying to get as close to satisfying a 100% of the people 100% of the time over-personalizing would fail to do that.&quot;

I have heard Larry and Sergey in the past talk about an ultimate search engine that would know what you want to search for before you search for it, i.e. the ultimate personalised search engine, right?

Now I know that such a search engine is a long way away but is there going to be a point that Google get so good at personalisation that what we consider over-personalisation now would be the accepted level of personalisation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview with a lot of interesting information.</p>
<p>Question on one thing: &#8220;Since you are trying to get as close to satisfying a 100% of the people 100% of the time over-personalizing would fail to do that.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have heard Larry and Sergey in the past talk about an ultimate search engine that would know what you want to search for before you search for it, i.e. the ultimate personalised search engine, right?</p>
<p>Now I know that such a search engine is a long way away but is there going to be a point that Google get so good at personalisation that what we consider over-personalisation now would be the accepted level of personalisation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

